---
title: Phasoric | Enterprise AI Context with Decisions and Evidence
description: Evaluate source-backed project context for your engineering agents. Inspect decisions, changed assumptions, authorized MCP retrieval and human review.
canonical_url: https://phasoric.com/enterprise-ai-context
markdown_url: https://phasoric.com/enterprise-ai-context.md
---
For CTOs, AI platform leaders and engineering teams

# Your agents know the task. Give them the decisions behind it.

Give the next agent the architecture choice, the constraint behind it and the evidence that changed. Keep a portable project record your team can inspect, with deliberate access and human review.

[Evaluate Phasoric on your workflow](#evaluate) [Start a self-service account](/signup?target=enterprise-ai-context)[Inspect the source example](#workflow-evidence)

## Operational continuity

Carry reviewed decisions and open questions across tasks. Ask the next authorized agent to retrieve the project record before it acts.

## Evidence you can inspect

Keep the source and revision alongside the reasoning. A changed assumption starts a review; it does not silently replace a decision.

## Ownership and governance

Portable Markdown, local-first choices and explicit vault mappings keep the knowledge under your control. Hosted access and external processing remain deliberate.

Inspect the example

## A new constraint. A decision worth revisiting.

Fictional project, prepared sources and review. These controls reveal the example; they make no AI requests, save no notes and grant no permissions.

1\. Original decision2\. Changed evidence3\. Review outcome

### Original decision

Atlas/Decisions/014-import-queue.md  
Revision: synthetic-v1 · Recorded: 2026-09-01

Keep imports asynchronous so a browser closing does not interrupt the job. Retain the original upload for seven days. Reuse a stable job key when retrying. The seven-day retention period is an assumption to review if storage policy changes.

### What the next session needs

-   The original reason for the queue.
-   The new limit on retention.
-   The unresolved recovery question.
-   The fact that a proposal is not approval.

A real client must retrieve these records from an authorized mapping and inspect the current revisions.

Inspect the context-selection case

Question: Can I replace the queue with a longer browser timeout?

Expected observation: A retention change does not remove the need to survive a browser closing. Cite both sources, preserve the queue requirement and flag the unresolved recovery question.

Excluded: an unrelated project launch note. These expected observations are authored examples. No retrieval algorithm, authorization boundary or model was executed to produce them.

[Download the complete synthetic example (JSON)](/assets/decision-review-example-Dn-3Ig09.json)

## Inspect the contract behind the workflow.

The public MCP reference describes authorized mappings, decision evidence and write previews. Documentation explains the contract; the prepared example above is not a connected test or a measured result.

[Read the public MCP contract and client configuration](https://developers.phasoric.com/mcp?target=enterprise-ai-context)[Review methods and limitations](/benchmarks?target=enterprise-ai-context)

A technical evaluation you can inspect

## Start with one decision your team keeps explaining.

Use a synthetic project first. Agree on the expected answer and a failure condition before connecting a client. This is a self-directed evaluation, using your existing account and plan.

1.  01
    
    ### Choose the evidence
    
    Select an ADR, a changed constraint and a reviewed brief. Keep source paths, revisions and unresolved questions with the record.
    
2.  02
    
    ### Verify an authorized read
    
    Follow the client configuration in the MCP reference, discover the mapping and inspect one retrieved source. Hosted MCP requires Premium or higher; local-only and device-encrypted remote notes are unavailable through that endpoint.
    
3.  03
    
    ### Return with a changed constraint
    
    In a fresh session, ask which assumption changed and which decision remains in force. Inspect both sources. Record missing, stale or incomplete evidence as a failure to investigate.
    
4.  04
    
    ### Review the proposed next step
    
    Ask for a proposed note update with its sources and exact destination. Keep it read-only unless you explicitly approve a write in your synthetic sandbox. Check current revisions and the resulting receipt.
    

[Open the MCP setup and contract](https://developers.phasoric.com/mcp?target=enterprise-ai-context) [Start a self-service account](/signup?target=enterprise-ai-context)[Check plans and limits](/pricing?target=enterprise-ai-context)

[Research & Benchmarks](/benchmarks?target=enterprise-ai-context)[Explore decision intelligence](/use-cases/decision-intelligence?target=enterprise-ai-context)[Explore agent memory](/ai-agent-memory?target=enterprise-ai-context)